For as long as I’ve been a horse owner, since 1990, I’ve been noticing that horse people are quite an intolerant lot. Regardless of whether you’re a regular rider or a horse owner. Whether your horse lives at a country stable or at the finest riding manège of the town. Whether your horse has a full-time or part-time turnout. Whether it has free access to hay or not. Whether it is shod or unshod. Whether you compete or not. Whether you ride with or without a bit. On a field or cross-country… sigh… the list is truly endless.
When discussion turns to the well-being of horses, the argumentation mainly focuses on whether the horse is being treated well or badly, and whether it can cope with the conditions the human has placed it in. Would it just be best if horses were let free, or does the opposite of this mean total oppression and exploitation of the horse?
So that all of us could learn from each other we need openness, and also acceptance of things that might be difficult to understand when you’re looking at them based on your own experiences. I’ll give a few examples here.
One very common problem seems to be that the horse might have its “rev counter stall”. A horse like this might be called hot, or just otherwise goofy. People who have gotten to know the horse as an animal understand that the horse doesn’t want to be hot or goofy, but that it’s characteristic to horses as a species to move their feet when their stress level goes up. To put it simply, a hot horse is stressed, and the situation isn’t likely to be very pleasant for the horse, especially if it happens e.g. every time the horse is ridden. In their mighty wisdom, humans come up with different aids and ways to keep the horse under control. Even if this isn’t unpleasant to the humans, it may cause many kinds of problems for the horse in the long run. Including physical ones.
Another example is a horse, whose owner wants to satisfy their horse’s every need to their last breath. When the human starts to realize the things a horse can display with its behavior and gestures, there’s a risk that the human will want to protect the horse, and to avoid further discomfort they stop doing anything with the horse but the things that are pleasant and suit the horse.
These extremes are most likely easy to identify and can be found in everyone’s circle of acquaintances. If one wants to look at these situations past all the humanity and wishes to consider what similarities they share, it helps to look at the horse.
In the first example the human might not acknowledge which of the horse’s resources remain unavailable to him or her, as the horse’s “mouth has been shut”. For the horse, as a prey animal, situations where the opportunity to flee has been removed have a great effect on its stress level. Sometimes it’s enough that the horse simply KNOWS it’s not being forced to do anything. On the other hand, a horse that has been forced for a long time might not be able to relax. It burns out, in a way.
When the horse is then listened to, and observed, and even the smallest of its wishes and needs fulfilled, it often happens that the horse will default to telling that it doesn’t like anything the human wants to do with it. This is the horror scenario that nobody wants to face, and because of that it’s easier to just close your eyes. I believe, however, that in their heart people know, despite all the defenses and justifications, that they may not be giving the horse everything it needs to be well.
So when, for one reason or another, you end up in a situation where the horse has had the chance to tell its opinion, which generally is no, a new opportunity emerges to teach the same things to the horse in a way that lets it see them in a positive light too.
I’ve met thousands of people during all these years, and most of them don’t give a hoot about the idea that horses have rights, and needless to say they haven’t realized how much more they could get out of their horse and their hobby if they stopped to listen sometime. At the same time those who have given their horse a chance have rarely regretted it. There’s always people who are too busy or cannot give their expectations time, and much less the chance to come true.
It’s amazing, then, that while most “problems” take a few practice sessions and a few thousand repeats after that to solve, there’s still time to do things wrong week after week, month after month, and to be displeased and unhappy.
Nobody can be taught against their will, and for my part I hope that the rift between horsemanship people, horse trainers, moral mongers and the rest of the horse world would narrow. Everyone could have something to learn from each other, after all. Nobody’s skills or experience should be belittled or underestimated, especially if there’s concrete backup, and above all if this skill and knowledge can be observed in the horse. You don’t have to understand everything, but until you can objectively evaluate others based on your own experience, it’s important to be tolerant. Without tolerance your own message doesn’t go out as it’s intended and therefore won’t be likely to reach its recipient.
This week’s guideline could be: nothing is right or wrong by default. It depends on the observer how you look at the situation.